This research tested the visual rightness theory of pictorial composition's
assertion that the induced organizational structure of a visually right (i
.e., "good") design is perceptually salient and judged superior by anyone v
iewing it regardless of his or her training in the visual arts. Stimuli for
Experiments 1 and 2 consisted of 16 reproductions of paintings by renowned
artists and an experimentally reconstructed less-well-organized version of
each art stimulus. It was found that design professionals (Experiment 2) w
ere significantly more successful at detecting the original versions than w
ere participants untrained in the visual arts (Experiment 1) (hit rates s =
64% and 55%, respectively). In Experiment 3 participants replaced a major
structural element removed from each of six pictures of the stimulus set at
the location where they thought it appears in the original. A significant
number of untrained participants and those with training in design theory w
ere in agreement as to the location of each element within its pictorial fi
eld; the location chosen conformed to its compositional structure but not i
ts actual location in the original. Findings demonstrate that the ability t
o detect the induced structural skeleton of a painting resulting from a vis
ually right design does not require expert knowledge of design principles w
hereas the ability to discriminate between several articulation possibiliti
es of the same composition does require formal training. (C) 1999 Elsevier
Science B.V. All rights reserved. PsycINFO classification. 2100; 2300.