Js. Younis et al., Activated protein C resistance and factor V Leiden mutation can be associated with first- as well as second-trimester recurrent pregnancy loss, AM J REPROD, 43(1), 2000, pp. 31-35
PROBLEM: To examine whether the occurrence of activated protein C resistanc
e (APCR) and factor V Leiden mutation differs in women with first- compared
to women with second-trimester unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
MEHTOD OF STUDY: Seventy eight consecutive women with two or more unexplain
ed post-embryonic recurrent pregnancy losses and 139 fertile women with at
least one successful pregnancy and no abortions were prospectively investig
ated for APCR and the factor V Leiden mutation. No women were pregnant at t
he time of investigation. APCR was defined as APC-sensitivity ratio (APC-SR
) of less than or equal to 2.0. All patients with an APC-SR less than or eq
ual to 2.4 were investigated for the factor V Leiden mutation. Women in thi
s study were divided into three groups. Group A included only women with a
history of recurrent first-trimester embryonic loss (37 women) and Group B
included women with second-trimester abortions with or without additional f
irst-trimester abortions (41 women). Group C included the controls (139 wom
en).
RESULTS: APCR and factor V Leiden mutations were significantly more prevale
nt in all recurrent pregnancy loss patients in this study as compared to co
ntrols, 38% (30/78) and 19% (15/78) in contrast to 8% (11/139) and 6% (8/13
9), respectively. All three groups in the study were comparable regarding a
ge, parity, and number of living children, whereas Groups A and B were also
comparable regarding gravidity. Mean APC-SRs were significantly higher in
Group C as compared to Groups A and B. The incidence of APCR was significan
tly higher in Groups A and B, as compared to controls, 27 and 49% in contra
st to 8%. respectively. Moreover, the incidence of the factor V Leiden muta
tion was significantly higher in Groups A and B as compared to Group C, 16
and 22% as distinct from 6%, respectively. The incidence of APCR was higher
in Group B as compared to Group A, 49% in contrast to 27%, with borderline
significance; however, the factor V Leiden mutation did not significantly
differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: APCR and factor V Leiden are associated with unexplained recur
rent pregnancy loss. The occurrence of APCR and factor V Leiden seems to be
linked to post-embryonic first-trimester as well as second-trimester recur
rent pregnancy loss. The significance of acquired, non-heritable APCR in re
current fetal loss patients, especially in the second-trimester aborters, i
s still to be determined.