A clinical syndrome including fever, leukocytosis, elevated cardiac output,
and reduced systemic vascular resistance has been associated with severe i
nfection (i.e., sepsis). However, during the last 15 years, many patients h
ave demonstrated all of the findings that have traditionally been associate
d with "sepsis" but have not had demonstrated sources of infection. This le
d to the term "sepsis syndrome" to refer to that population of patients who
appeared to have a physiologic and metabolic response associated with, but
who did not have, severe infection. More commonly called the systemic infl
ammatory response syndrome (SIRS), the sepsis syndrome is now associated wi
th the nonspecific systemic activation of the human inflammatory cascade by
any of a number of clinical events. The management of the SIRS patient has
been ineffective because of incomplete definition of the mechanisms respon
sible for the syndrome. It is argued that all of the biological mechanisms
that are operative in a simple wound and are beneficial are negative for th
e host when activated systemically. Thus, SIRS is seen in three separate sc
enarios at present: (1) invasive infection; (2) dissemination of microbes s
econdary to failure of host defense mechanisms; and (3) severe activation o
f inflammation by injury, shock, severe soft tissue inflammation, and other
noninfectious but proinflammatory events. Newer treatment strategies will
need to focus not on the inciting event itself but on better control of the
complex responses of the host.