Right reason in the integration of group and single-subject research in behavioral disorders

Citation
Ka. Kavale et al., Right reason in the integration of group and single-subject research in behavioral disorders, BEHAV DISOR, 25(2), 2000, pp. 142-157
Citations number
115
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS
ISSN journal
01987429 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
142 - 157
Database
ISI
SICI code
0198-7429(200002)25:2<142:RRITIO>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
In this discussion of quantitative research synthesis (meta-analysis), past criticisms of meta-analysis are reviewed along with the ways in which they have been addressed. The problems associated with synthesizing single-subj ect research are discussed, particularly the difficulties in obtaining a me tric equivalent to the effect size calculated for group-design research. Af ter analyzing recommended approaches, the authors endorse the percentage-of -nonoverlapping-data metric. Their earlier single-subject synthesis showing limited efficacy for social skills instruction is then reviewed. The findi ngs are discussed in relation to the nature of single-subject research, the proper role of research integration, and the influence of subjectivity in interpreting research findings. Finally, possible reasons for disappointing findings regarding the effectiveness of social skills instruction are expl ored. The authors conclude that, until expressed concerns are remedied, it is neither incorrect nor illogical to question the efficacy of social skill s instruction.