Use of abdominal computed tomography in blunt trauma: Do we scan too much?

Citation
Bg. Garber et al., Use of abdominal computed tomography in blunt trauma: Do we scan too much?, CAN J SURG, 43(1), 2000, pp. 16-21
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
0008428X → ACNP
Volume
43
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
16 - 21
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-428X(200002)43:1<16:UOACTI>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine what proportion of abdominal computed tomography ( CT) scans ordered after blunt trauma are positive and the applicability and accuracy of existing clinical prediction rules for obtaining a CT scan of the abdomen in this setting. SETTING: A leading trauma hospital, affiliated with the University of Ottaw a. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with blunt trauma admitted to hospital o ver a I-year period haring an Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 12 w ho underwent CT of the abdomen during the initial assessment. Recorded data included age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, ISS, type of injuries, number of abdominal CT scans ordered, and scan results. Two clinical predic tion rules were found in the literature that identify patients likely to ha ve intra-abdominal injuries. These rules were applied retrospectively to th e cohort. The predicted proportion of positive CT scans was compared with t he observed proportion, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were estimated. RESULTS: Of the 297 patients entered in the study, 109 underwent abdominal CT. The median age was 32 years, 71% were male and the median ISS was 24. I n only 36.7% (40 of 109) of scans were findings suggestive of intra-abdomin al injuries. Application of one of the clinical prediction rules gave a sen sitivity of 93.8% and specificity of 25.5% but excluded 23% of patients bec ause of a GCS score less than 11. The second prediction rule tested could b e applied to all patients and was highly sensitive (92.5%) and specific (10 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of the abdomen in blunt trauma remains a challe nge. Accuracy in predicting positive scans in equivocal cases is poor. Retr ospective application of an existing clinical prediction rule was found to be highly accurate in identifying patients with positive CT findings. Prosp ective use of such a rule could reduce the number of CT scans ordered witho ut missing significant injuries.