OBJECTIVES: To determine what proportion of abdominal computed tomography (
CT) scans ordered after blunt trauma are positive and the applicability and
accuracy of existing clinical prediction rules for obtaining a CT scan of
the abdomen in this setting.
SETTING: A leading trauma hospital, affiliated with the University of Ottaw
a.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with blunt trauma admitted to hospital o
ver a I-year period haring an Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 12 w
ho underwent CT of the abdomen during the initial assessment. Recorded data
included age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, ISS, type of injuries,
number of abdominal CT scans ordered, and scan results. Two clinical predic
tion rules were found in the literature that identify patients likely to ha
ve intra-abdominal injuries. These rules were applied retrospectively to th
e cohort. The predicted proportion of positive CT scans was compared with t
he observed proportion, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were
estimated.
RESULTS: Of the 297 patients entered in the study, 109 underwent abdominal
CT. The median age was 32 years, 71% were male and the median ISS was 24. I
n only 36.7% (40 of 109) of scans were findings suggestive of intra-abdomin
al injuries. Application of one of the clinical prediction rules gave a sen
sitivity of 93.8% and specificity of 25.5% but excluded 23% of patients bec
ause of a GCS score less than 11. The second prediction rule tested could b
e applied to all patients and was highly sensitive (92.5%) and specific (10
0.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of the abdomen in blunt trauma remains a challe
nge. Accuracy in predicting positive scans in equivocal cases is poor. Retr
ospective application of an existing clinical prediction rule was found to
be highly accurate in identifying patients with positive CT findings. Prosp
ective use of such a rule could reduce the number of CT scans ordered witho
ut missing significant injuries.