OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the technical feasibility a
nd the postoperative course of aortic valve replacement through a ministern
otomy.
SETTING: The Montreal Heart Institute and the Hopital Lariboisiere, Paris,
France.
DESIGN: A case series from 2 institutions.
PATIENTS: Fifty-one patients who underwent aortic valve replacement through
a ministernotomy. The sternal incision was started at the level of the ste
rnal notch extending down to the third or fourth intercostal space with a t
ransverse section of the sternum at this level on both sides or limited to
the right side (inverted T or L incision). Thirty-nine patients had aortic
stenoses, 6 patients were operated for aortic insufficiency and 6 had mixed
disease, The mean land standard deviation) preoperative left ventricular e
jection fraction was 0.56 (0.17).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiac bypass time, complications and outcome.
RESULTS: The patients received Carbomedics and St. Jude mechanical valves,
Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses. Thirty-eight patients were ad
ministered antegrade and retrograde cardioplegia, 10 patients antegrade and
3 retrograde blood cardioplegia only. The mean land standard error) cardio
pulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time were 104 (38) minutes and
72 (16) minutes respectively. Two patients (4%) died and 2 patients (4%) s
howed evidence of a stroke after the procedure. Hospital stay averaged 8 (5
) days.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that aortic valve replacement can be done through a
ministernotomy approach with perioperative results similar to those obtain
ed through a conventional sternotomy.