Antibiotics and Clostridium difficile diarrhea in the ambulatory care setting

Citation
Dg. Levy et al., Antibiotics and Clostridium difficile diarrhea in the ambulatory care setting, CLIN THER, 22(1), 2000, pp. 91-102
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
ISSN journal
01492918 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
91 - 102
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-2918(200001)22:1<91:AACDDI>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of Clostr idium difficile diarrhea (CDD) and the risk for CDD associated with differe nt oral antibiotics commonly used in the ambulatory care setting. Methods: The prevalence of CDD was determined for enrollees in 4 UnitedHeal th Group-affiliated health plans between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1994. Cases were identified based on the presence of an inpatient or outpat ient claim with a primary diagnosis of diarrhea, a pharmacy claim for a pre scription drug used to treat CDD, or a physician or facility claim for the C difficile toxin test, and were confirmed using full-text medical records. Within a retrospective cohort design, periods of risk for CDD were defined on the basis of duration of antibiotic therapy. To control for potential s election bias created by heterogeneous rates of C difficile testing and to limit confounding due to multiple antibiotic exposures, we used a nested ca se-control design, restricting eligibility to subjects who underwent screen ing for C difficile and who had been exposed to only 1 antibiotic risk peri od with a single antibiotic. Results: The global prevalence of CDD in 358,389 ambulatory care enrollees was 12 per 100,000 person-years. In the nested case-control study, after co ntrolling for other risk factors, 2 antibiotics demonstrated an increased a ssociation with CDD: cephalexin (odds ratio [OR] = 7.5, 95% CI = 1.8 to 34. 7) and cefixime (OR = 6.4, 95% CI = 1.2 to 39.0). Conclusions: Although CDD is thought to occur primarily in hospitalized pat ients, it was found to be present in an ambulatory care population, but at a low frequency. In this population, it appeared to be associated with 2 ce phalosporins but not with other types of antibiotics usually linked with no socomial CDD. Because the frequency of C difficile testing was shown to be more common with high-risk antibiotics, CDD may be underdiagnosed in the am bulatory care setting.