S. Melamed et R. David, Ongoing clinical assessment of the safety profile and efficacy of brimonidine compared with timolol: Year-three results, CLIN THER, 22(1), 2000, pp. 103-111
Objective: We compared the safety profile and efficacy of brimonidine 0.2%
BID with those of timolol 0.5% BID over 3 years in patients with ocular hyp
ertension and glaucoma.
Methods: Ninety-four eligible patients from an ongoing multicenter, interve
ntional, double-masked clinical trial were followed through year 3, 48 rece
iving brimonidine 0.2% and 46 receiving timolol 0.5%. Study visits occurred
at months 24, 27, 30, 33, and 36. The primary efficacy variable was mean r
eduction from baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) at trough. Visual acuity,
visual fields, and safety variables (adverse events, ocular symptoms, hear
t rate, blood pressure, and laboratory test results) were monitored through
out the study.
Results: The 2 treatment groups were well matched, with no significant diff
erences in demographic or clinical characteristics. Both drug regimens caus
ed significant mean reductions from baseline IOP at trough during year 3 (P
< 0.001), with no significant differences between groups at any study visi
t. The overall mean reduction from baseline IOP at trough was 5.02 mm Hg wi
th brimonidine and 5.57 mm Hg with timolol (P = 0.383). Brimonidine caused
reductions in IOP at trough that were equivalent to those with timolol at m
onths 30 and 36 (within the 95% CI). Visual fields were unchanged or improv
ed in 95% of patients in both treatment groups. Both drug regimens appeared
to be safe and were well tolerated. Ocular allergy occurred in 2 brimonidi
ne-treated patients (4.2%). There were no statistically significant differe
nces in adverse-event reports and no clinically significant effects on any
ocular or systemic safety variable in either group.
Conclusions: Brimonidine 0.2% BID continues to appear to be safe, well tole
rated, and effective in the long-term management of ocular hypertension and
glaucoma. Over 3 years, it provided sustained IOP-lowering efficacy and vi
sual-field preservation equal to those with timolol 0.5% BID.