Contralateral EEG slowing and amobarbital distribution in Wada test: An intracarotid SPECT study

Citation
Sb. Hong et al., Contralateral EEG slowing and amobarbital distribution in Wada test: An intracarotid SPECT study, EPILEPSIA, 41(2), 2000, pp. 207-212
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
EPILEPSIA
ISSN journal
00139580 → ACNP
Volume
41
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
207 - 212
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-9580(200002)41:2<207:CESAAD>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Purpose: To relate the occurrence of contralateral electroencephalogram slo wing (CES) to amobarbital distribution, we performed electroencephalogram ( EEG) monitoring and intracarotid single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) during an intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP). Methods: IAP was performed on 22 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. CES was defined as the occurrence of significant EEG slowing on the contralater al hemisphere (>50% of the ipsilateral hemisphere slowing) after amobarbita l injection. To map the distribution of the amobarbital, we injected a mixt ure of amobarbital and (99m)technetium-ethylcysteinate dimer (Tc-99m-ECD) i nto the internal carotid artery and performed a brain SPECT 2 h later. In t he SPECT images, regions of interest were determined by ipsilateral and con tralateral anterior cerebral artery territories (iACA, cACA), ipsilateral a nd contralateral middle cerebral artery territories (iMCA, cMCA), and ipsil ateral and contralateral posterior cerebral artery territories (iPCA, cPCA) , as well as ipsilateral and contralateral anterior and posterior mesial te mporal regions (iAMT, cAMT, iPMT, cPMT). The perfusion of amobarbital was i nterpreted visually in each region. Results: Amobarbital was distributed in the iMCA in all the patients; in th e iACA in 20 (90.9%) patients; in the iAMT in 14 (63.5%); and in the iPCA a nd iPMT in only two (9.1%). CES was observed in 13 (59.1%) patients. Cross- perfusion of amobarbital in limited areas of the cACA were observed in only four of 13 patients. Wada retention memory scores (WRMS) showed no signifi cant difference between the CES- (n = 9) and CES+ (n = 13) groups. Conclusions: Amobarbital rarely perfused the iPCA territory and the iPMT re gion and was rarely delivered to the contralateral hemisphere. The occurren ce of CES was not related to the cross-perfusion of amobarbital. CES appear s to be produced by a transient functional disconnection from the ipsilater al hemisphere.