Recurrent pain after lumbar discectomy: the diagnostic value of peridural scar on MRI

Citation
Jp. Vogelsang et al., Recurrent pain after lumbar discectomy: the diagnostic value of peridural scar on MRI, EUR SPINE J, 8(6), 1999, pp. 475-479
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
ISSN journal
09406719 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
475 - 479
Database
ISI
SICI code
0940-6719(199912)8:6<475:RPALDT>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
The association between peridural scarring and recurrent pain after lumbar discectomy is much debated. A recently published study found that patients with extensive peridural fibrosis were 3.2 times more likely to experience recurrent radicular pain than those with less extensive scarring. This find ing may lead to an overestimation of peridural fibrosis in clinical practic e. In a retrospective study we analyzed the records of 53 patients who unde rwent a lumbar MRI because of recurrent pain after first unilateral microdi scectomy. Patients were classified as those with radicular or non-radicular pain according to history and clinical findings. The diagnosis was confirm ed by spinal anesthetic block. The extension of scarring was compared betwe en the two groups of patients. The amount of epidural fibrosis was examined on contrast-enhanced MRI in axial slices subdivided into four quadrants. T he amount of fibrosis was divided into four stages in each affected quadran t. We found no differences regarding the amount of peridural fibrosis betwe en patients with radicular pain and patients with non-radicular pain. We co nclude that the extent of peridural scarring as defined by MRI is of minor value in the differential diagnosis of recurrent back and leg pain after lu mbar microdiscectomy.