The association between peridural scarring and recurrent pain after lumbar
discectomy is much debated. A recently published study found that patients
with extensive peridural fibrosis were 3.2 times more likely to experience
recurrent radicular pain than those with less extensive scarring. This find
ing may lead to an overestimation of peridural fibrosis in clinical practic
e. In a retrospective study we analyzed the records of 53 patients who unde
rwent a lumbar MRI because of recurrent pain after first unilateral microdi
scectomy. Patients were classified as those with radicular or non-radicular
pain according to history and clinical findings. The diagnosis was confirm
ed by spinal anesthetic block. The extension of scarring was compared betwe
en the two groups of patients. The amount of epidural fibrosis was examined
on contrast-enhanced MRI in axial slices subdivided into four quadrants. T
he amount of fibrosis was divided into four stages in each affected quadran
t. We found no differences regarding the amount of peridural fibrosis betwe
en patients with radicular pain and patients with non-radicular pain. We co
nclude that the extent of peridural scarring as defined by MRI is of minor
value in the differential diagnosis of recurrent back and leg pain after lu
mbar microdiscectomy.