P. Holgen et B. Hanell, Performance of planted and naturally regenerated seedlings in Picea abies-dominated shelterwood stands and clearcuts in Sweden, FOREST ECOL, 127(1-3), 2000, pp. 129-138
This study was focussed on regeneration of Norway spruce (Picea abies)-domi
nated forests on fertile, drained peatlands located along a north-south gra
dient in Sweden. Naturally established seedlings of mainly spruce and pubes
cent birch were inventoried with respect to numbers and height, and planted
(large, bare-root) spruce seedlings in 10-year-old shelterwoods and clearc
uts with respect to survival, damage and height development. Two shelterwoo
d densities were studied, 140 and 200 trees ha(-1). The planting treatment
also included site preparation (mounding in shelterwoods, mounding and no m
ounding in clearcuts). The planted seedlings and the natural regeneration w
ere inventoried 9 and 11 growing seasons after cut, respectively.
Large numbers of naturally established spruce and birch (Betula sp.) seedli
ngs were obtained without soil preparation in the shelterwoods. The height
development of these spruce seedlings was, however, much slower than that o
f the planted shelterwood seedlings, indicating 2-3 times longer regenerati
on period (up to 20 years) for the natural regeneration alternative. In the
clearcuts, only birch seedlings established naturally. In all the study ar
eas, planting in mounds was equally or more successful (survival, height, d
amage) in shelterwoods than in clearcuts. Planting without mounding in the
clearcuts was nor successful (low survival rate and height, extensive damag
e). In general, the number of naturally established seedlings in shelterwoo
ds, and the survival rate of planted seedlings in clearcuts and shelterwood
s, were much lower in the study areas in central Sweden than in the areas i
n the north and south. The results from the study suggest that shelterwood
methods (by natural establishment or planting) used in highly productive sp
ruce forests yield acceptable or desirable levels of regeneration. (C) 2000
Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.