The normalized radar cross section of the sea at 10 degrees incidence

Citation
V. Hesany et al., The normalized radar cross section of the sea at 10 degrees incidence, IEEE GEOSCI, 38(1), 2000, pp. 64-72
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Eletrical & Eletronics Engineeing
Journal title
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
ISSN journal
01962892 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Part
1
Pages
64 - 72
Database
ISI
SICI code
0196-2892(200001)38:1<64:TNRCSO>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Measurements of the normalized radar cross section of the sea at K-u band a t an incidence angle of 10 degrees were performed from a manned airship off the Oregon coast in September and October of 1993. The cross section at th is incidence angle is often assumed to hare little dependence on windspeed and direction, Our measurements, however, indicate that at windspeeds below 6-7 mis, the cross section is in fact dependent on these quantities, and t he azimuthal modulation can reach values on the order of 5-8 dB. Comparison s of the measured values with the predictions of the quasispecular scatteri ng model are presented. The theory is shown to be accurate in predicting th e azimuthal modulation and the strength of the backscatter if the effects o f swell are included or if measured wind directions are ignored and the upw ind direction is forced to be near the maximum cross section. Values of mea n-square wind-wave slope and effective-reflection coefficient required to o btain these fits are very close to those obtained by previous investigators . In particular, mean-square wind-wave slopes are about 70-80 % of those of Cox and Munk (1953) because the radar responds only to facets larger than about 10 cm, with smaller ripples acting to reduce the reflection coefficie nt. If swell is included, we find that mean-square slopes in the direction of the swell, that are as much as ten times the measured smell slopes, are required to fit the model to the cross-section data at low windspeeds. We s uggest that this may be due to high-order effects of the hydrodynamic modul ation of short waves by the swell, We believe that this explanation is more likely than assuming that wind directions were incorrectly measured.