Kj. Donald et al., Setting safe and effective suction pressure: the effect of using a manometer in the suction circuit, INTEN CAR M, 26(1), 2000, pp. 15-19
Objectives: To establish the levels of pressure used to perform tracheal su
ction (TS) and if they are affected by having a manometer visible in the su
ction circuit.
Design: A bench test evaluation of simulated tracheal suction.
Setting: Physiotherapy department of a major teaching hospital in Melbourne
, Australia.
Participants: Sixty-four nurses and physiotherapists who regularly apply TS
to patients in the intensive care units of this hospital.
Interventions: All subjects used both circuit A (without a visible manomete
r) and B (with a visible manometer) in a predetermined random order. For bo
th, subjects adjusted the suction control tap to where they said a safe and
effective pressure (set pressure) was delivered:and then occluded the suct
ion catheter as though suctioning (applied pressure). Subjects then complet
ed a questionnaire on their current TS practise.
Measurements and results: All set pressures (mean = 228.57 mmHg) and all ap
plied pressures (mean = 359.52 mmHg) were significantly higher (P < .001) w
hen compared to the expected pressures (mean = 135 mmHg). Pressures set wit
hout a visible manometer (circuit A) were significantly higher (P < .05) th
an those using a visible manometer (circuit B) but the applied pressures we
re not significantly different (P = .166). Neither the investigator (P = .6
18) or the test order (P = .167) had a significant effect on the outcome. Q
uestionnaire results showed 31% of subjects considered 100-170 mmHg a safe
and effective suction pressure whilst none reported using an objective mean
s of measuring pressure.
Conclusion: All pressures in both circuits were significantly higher than t
hose recommended as safe in the literature. In addition, pressures were una
ffected by the inclusion of a visible manometer in the suction circuit.