Ve. Beattie et al., The effect of providing additional feed in a highly accessible trough on feeding behaviour and growth performance of weaned pigs, IRISH J A F, 38(2), 1999, pp. 209-216
Two trials were conducted to determine the effects of providing additional
feed in a highly accessible trough on performance of weaned pigs. In Trial
1, 240 piglets were weaned into flat-deck kennels in groups of 15 and alloc
ated to treatment, ensuring that groups were balanced for live weight, gend
er and randomised over litters. The two treatments were 'control', consisti
ng of two single space wet-dry (SSWD) feeders per pen, and 'trough', consis
ting of two SSWD feeders per pen as in control with additional wet feed pro
vided in a highly accessible trough. Feed was offered ad libitum via the SS
WD feeders in both treatments. In the trough treatment, 150 g of feed was a
dded to the trough in a 2:1 ratio with water, three times daily for 5 days
post weaning. Feeding behaviour was also recorded for 5 days post weaning.
Providing additional wet feed in a trough improved daily feed intake for 2
days post weaning and over the first 3 weeks post weaning (Stage I) but gro
wth rate and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were not affected. The number of p
igs feeding at the SSWD feeders was reduced (P < 0.05) by the provision of
additional feed in a trough. In Trial 2, the treatments were additional wet
feed in a trough (present, absent) and pig weight at weaning (heavy (10.1
kg), light (7.6 kg)) in a 2 x 2 factorial design. Providing additional wet
feed in a trough improved feed intake for 2 days post weaning but did not a
ffect intake, growth rate or FCR over the entire Stage I period. When pigle
ts were grouped into heavy and light categories, heavy pigs had proportiona
lly 0.10 higher feed intakes (P < 0.01) but similar growth rates and propor
tionally 0.04 poorer FCR (P < 0.05) than light pigs. It is concluded that p
roviding additional feed in a highly accessible trough offered no advantage
s in terms of performance of weaned pigs but added labour cost and redirect
ed feeding behaviour away from the SSWD feeders.