Reproducibility of diagnosis and its influence on the distribution of lungcancer by histologic type in Osaka, Japan

Citation
S. Yamamoto et al., Reproducibility of diagnosis and its influence on the distribution of lungcancer by histologic type in Osaka, Japan, JPN J CANC, 91(1), 2000, pp. 1-8
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH
ISSN journal
09105050 → ACNP
Volume
91
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1 - 8
Database
ISI
SICI code
0910-5050(200001)91:1<1:RODAII>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
The histologic types of lung cancer cases diagnosed in 1979-1980 (n=799) an d 1987 (n=587) were independently reviewed by two pathologists in order to investigate the reproducibility of the diagnosis of the histologic type whe n the WHO classification (1981) was used, The specimens from 354 surgical c ases and biopsy or cytology specimens from 1032 non-surgical cases were rev iewed. The inter-observer agreement was 87.9% (kappa=0.79) for surgical cas es and 81.4% (kappa=0.72) for non-surgical cases. When compared to the orig inal diagnosis, the agreement was 86.8% (kappa=0.78) for surgical and 86.4% (kappa=0.79) for non-surgical cases in 1979-1980 and the agreement was 92. 8% (kappa=0.87) for surgical and 89.1% (kappa=0.83) for non-surgical cases in 1987, By histologic type, no difference in the agreement was observed ex cept for large cell carcinoma. The distribution of histologic types after t he review differed only slightly (less than 6%) from the original distribut ion, This suggests that in Osaka, Japan, the diagnosis based on the WHO cla ssification (1981) had only a limited influence on the distribution of hist ologic types, and is not a major reason for the changing trends in lung can cer incidence by histologic type.