Rj. Schneider et al., Motivational versus confrontational interviewing: A comparison of substance abuse assessment practices at employee assistance programs, J BEHAV H S, 27(1), 2000, pp. 60-74
The aim of this study was to conduct a quasi-experimental comparison of two
employee assistance program (EAP) assessment approaches with substance abu
sers: confrontational interviewing (CI) and motivational interviewing (MI).
A total of 176 EAP clients from 14 study sites met the study criteria, and
89 (51%) agreed to participate in the study. At three and nine months post
assessment, both the MI and CI groups showed similar changes in readiness f
or change completion of initial treatment plans, and subsequent treatment,
Most important, both the MI and CI participants showed significant and comp
arable improvement on all of the substance abuse baseline measures as well
as measures of family-social well-being and effects of drinking/drugging on
work performance. The results open the door for EAP counselors to use an e
mpirically supported assessment style that is at least as effective as the
traditional confrontational approach.