Effects of milrinone versus epinephrine on grafted internal mammary arteryflow after cardiopulmonary bypass

Citation
Eb. Lobato et al., Effects of milrinone versus epinephrine on grafted internal mammary arteryflow after cardiopulmonary bypass, J CARDIOTHO, 14(1), 2000, pp. 9-11
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA
ISSN journal
10530770 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
9 - 11
Database
ISI
SICI code
1053-0770(200002)14:1<9:EOMVEO>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Objective: To compare changes on grafted internal mammary artery (IMA) flow after cardiopulmonary bypass in response to the administration of milrinon e or epinephrine. Design: Prospective and randomized. Setting: University-affiliated hospital. Participants: Twenty consenting, adult patients undergoing CABG. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either milrinone, 50 mu g/kg, or epinephrine, 0.03 mu g/kg/min, immediately after cardiopulmonary b ypass. IMA flow was measured with a laser Doppler flow probe before and aft er the administration of either drug. Measurements and Main Results: Baseline grafted IMA flow was similar for bo th groups (milrinone, 38 +/- 14 mL/min; epinephrine, 33 +/- 10 mL/min). In patients who received milrinone, flow increased by 24% to 50 +/- 17 mL/min, p < 0.05; whereas with epinephrine, it remained essentially unchanged (33 +/- 10 v 31 +/- 11 mL/min). Conclusions: This study confirms that the vasodilatory effect of milrinone on the IMA is also present after its anastomosis, whereas low-dose epinephr ine exhibits neither beneficial nor adverse effects. It is suggested that i n the absence of excessive vasodilation, milrinone should be considered as a first-line inotrope after coronary artery bypass graft surgery, to achiev e an increase in contractility and IMA artery flow. Copyright (C) 2000 by W .B. Saunders Company.