Influence of thiopental and propofol on postoperative cognitive recovery in the elderly patient undergoing general anesthesia

Citation
B. Fredman et al., Influence of thiopental and propofol on postoperative cognitive recovery in the elderly patient undergoing general anesthesia, J CLIN ANES, 11(8), 1999, pp. 635-640
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
ISSN journal
09528180 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
635 - 640
Database
ISI
SICI code
0952-8180(199912)11:8<635:IOTAPO>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Study Objective: To assess mental and psychomotor recovery following induct ion of anesthesia with thiopental or propofol in elderly patients undergoin g general anesthesia. Design: Randomized, prospective, double-blind study. Setting: Large referral hospital. Patients: 40 elderly patients ASA physical status I-III (>65 years) undergo ing abdomino-pelvic surgery with an estimated surgical time of at least 90 minutes. Interventions: All patients received combined epidural-general anesthesia. After establishing a T-6 sensory blockade, patients were randomized to rece ive either thiopental or propofol for induction of general anesthesia. The induction drug was slowly titrated until loss of eyelash reflex was noted. Thereafter, all patients received desflurane (2% to 3% end-tidal) and 70% n itrous oxide (N2O) in oxygen for maintenance of general anesthesia. To faci litate tracheal intubation, intravenous alfentanil 10 mu g/kg and atracuriu m 0.4 mg/kg were administered. Perioperative analgesia was maintained with epidural bupivacaine. Measurements and Main Results: A digit substitution test (DSST) and shape-s orter test, as well as patient-generated 100-mm visual analog score (VAS; 0 = minimal and 100 = maximal) for anxiety, sleepiness, and coordination, lu cre performed during the preanesthetic interview, on postanesthesia care un it admission, and at 15, 45, 90, and 120 minutes thereafter. To induce loss of consciousness, either thiopental 2.5 +/- 1.0 mg/kg or propofol 1.6 +/- 0.6 mg/kg was administered. The mean anesthetic time was 109 +/- 30 minutes and 114 +/- 38 minutes for the thiopental and propofol groups, respectivel y. Emergence, extubation, and orientation times, as well as time to follow commands, were unaffected by patient randomization. Similarly, the DSTT and shape-sorter tests, in addition to the patient-generated VAS for pain, anx iety, and coordination, were similar among groups. However, irrespective of treatment modality, return to baseline digit substitution and shape-sorter scores were significantly delayed (p < 0.01). Conclusion: When compared to thiopental, propofol does not facilitate impro ved cognitive recovery in geriatric patients undergoing prolonged surgery. (C) 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc.