Gr. Lauretti et al., Low doses of epidural ketamine or neostigmine, but not midazolam, improve morphine analgesia in epidural terminal cancer pain therapy, J CLIN ANES, 11(8), 1999, pp. 663-668
Study Objective: To examine analgesia and adverse effects of combination ep
idural pain therapy consisting of administration of morphine with either lo
w dose of ketamine, neostigmine, or midazolam in terminal cancer pain patie
nts.
Design: Randomized double-blind study.
Setting: Teaching hospital.
Patients: 48 terminal cancer patients suffering from chronic pain.
Interventions: Patients were randomized to one of four groups (n = 12). The
concept of visual analog scale (VAS), which consisted of a IO-cm line with
0 equaling "no pain at all" and 10 equaling "the worst possible pain" was
introduced. All patients were taking oral amitriptyline 50 mg at bedtime. P
ain was initially treated with epidural morphine 2 mg twice daily (12-hr in
tervals) to maintain the VAS below 4/10. Afterwards, VAS scores greater tha
n or equal to 4/10 at any time were treated by adding the epidural study dr
ug (2 ml), which runs administered each morning, just after the 2-mg epidur
al morphine administration. The control group, (CG) received 2 mg of epidur
al morphine (2 ml). The ketamine group (KG) received 0.2 mg/kg epidural ket
amine (2 ml). The neostigmine group (NG) received 100 mu g epidural, neosti
gmine (2 ml). The midazolam group (MG) received 500 mu g epidural midazolam
(2 ml). Patients received the study drugs on a daily basis.
Measurements and Main Results: Duration of effective analgesia was measured
as time from the study drug administration to the first patient's VAS scor
e greater than or equal to 4/10 recorded in days. The groups were demograph
ically the same. The VAS pain scores prior to the treatment were also simil
ar among groups. Only the patients in the KG demonstrated lower VAS scores
compared to the MG (p = 0.018). Time since the epidural study drug administ
ration until patient complaint of pain VAS greater than or equal to 4/10 wa
s higher for both the KG and NG compared to the CG (KG > CG, p = 0.049; NG
> CG; p = 0.0163). Only the KG used less epidural morphine compared to the
CG during the period of study (25 days) (p = 0.003).
Conclusion: The association of either low-dose epidural ketamine or neostig
mine (but not midazolam) to epidural morphine increased the duration of ana
lgesia in the population studied (gt; 20 days) compared to the CG and MG (8
to 10 days) when administrered in the early stages of terminal cancer pain
therapy, without increasing the incidence of adverse effects. (C) 2000 by
Elsevier Science Inc.