Ml. Landry et D. Ferguson, SimulFluor respiratory screen for rapid detection of multiple respiratory viruses in clinical specimens by immunofluorescence staining, J CLIN MICR, 38(2), 2000, pp. 708-711
A new rapid direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) respiratory screen reagen
t for detection of seven common respiratory viruses (respiratory syncytial
virus [RSV], influenza A and B viruses, parainfluenza virus types 1 to 3, a
nd adenovirus) was compared with standard single or dual DFA reagents and c
ulture. In total, 1,531 respiratory samples were adequate for testing with
both SimulFluor Respiratory Screen (RS) reagent (Chemicon International, Te
mecula, Calif.) and single or dual DFA reagents. The RS DFA reagent detecte
d 367 (98.4%) and single or dual DFA reagents detected 368 (98.7%) of 373 D
FA-positive samples. In addition, the RS DFA reagent was equivalent to or b
etter than culture for detection of all viruses except adenovirus. Only 15
of 799 (1.9%) RS-negative samples inoculated into cell cultures yielded res
piratory virus isolates tone RSV, five influenza A virus, two influenza B v
irus! one parainfluenza virus, and six adenovirus). Sixty-six other virus i
solates (13 rhinovirus, 24 cytomegalovirus, 28 herpes simplex virus type II
and 1 enterovirus) were also recovered in culture. with cytospin preparati
on of slides, only 7.5% of samples submitted were deemed inadequate for DFA
. The availability of a rapid DFA screening reagent for detection of multip
le common respiratory viruses within I to 2 h of sample collection should b
e of great benefit in terms of patient management and infection control.