Auj. Yap et al., Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator. Part II. An SEM evaluation, J ORAL REH, 27(1), 2000, pp. 52-59
The qualitative wear of amalgam alloys and composite resins opposing cast c
hromium alloys after impact-sliding wear simulation with the BIOMAT wear si
mulator was assessed. An impact stress of 28 MPa was adopted to allow for s
tresses generated during parafunctional activities. The worn specimens were
examined using SEM at both impact sites and region of sliding wear. For am
algam alloys, ranking from the smoothest to the roughest surface under SEM
observation was as follows: unicompositional alloy > admired alloy > galliu
m alloy. For composite resins the ranking was: microfilled composite > smal
l particle composite > hybrid composite. The qualitative SEM assessment res
ults were consistent with our earlier volumetric wear results and supports
the hypothesis that surface microstructure affects wear. Composite selectio
n for teeth opposing cast chrome prostheses should be done with caution and
knowledge of the composition of the material as three-body wear may occur.