V. Wenzel et al., Survival with full neurologic recovery and no cerebral pathology after prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation with vasopressin in pigs, J AM COL C, 35(2), 2000, pp. 527-533
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the effects of vasopressin and saline pla
cebo in comparison with epinephrine on neurologic recovery and possible cer
ebral pathology in an established porcine model of prolonged cardiopulmonar
y resuscitation (CPR).
BACKGROUND It is unknown whether increased cerebral: blood flow during CPR
with vasopressin is beneficial with regard to neurologic recovery or detrim
ental owing to complications such as cerebral edema after return of spontan
eous circulation.
METHODS After 4 min of cardiac arrest, followed by 3 min of basic life supp
ort CPR, 17 animals were randomly assigned to receive every 5 min either va
sopressin (0.4, 0.4 and 0.8 U/kg; n = 6), epinephrine (45, 45 and 200 mu g/
kg; n = 6) or saline placebo (n = 5). The mean value +/- SEM of aortic dias
tolic pressure was significantly (p < 0.05) higher 90 s after each of three
vasopressin versus epinephrine versus saline placebo injections (60 +/- 3
vs. 45 +/- 3 vs. 29 +/- 2 mm Hg; 49 +/- 5 vs. 27 +/- 3 vs. 23 +/- 1 mm Hg;
and 50 +/- 6 vs. 21 +/- 3 vs. 16 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively). After 22 min o
f cardiac arrest, including 18 min of CPR, defibrillation was attempted to
achieve return of spontaneous circulation.
RESULTS All the pigs that received epinephrine and saline placebo died, whe
reas all pigs on vasopressin survived (p < 0.05). Neurologic evaluation 24
h after successful resuscitation revealed only an unsteady gait in all vaso
pressin-treated animals; after 96 h, magnetic resonance imaging revealed no
cerebral pathology.
CONCLUSIONS During prolonged CPR, repeated vasopressin administration, but
not epinephrine or saline placebo, ensured long-term survival with full neu
rologic recovery and no cerebral pathology in this porcine CPR model. (J Am
Coll Cardiol 2000;35:527-33) (C) 2000 by the American College of Cardiolog
y.