Purpose: The finding of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in a
biopsy specimen without prostate cancer warrants repeat biopsy because of
the risk of concurrent cancer. However, to our knowledge the optimal repeat
biopsy technique has not yet been defined. We determined the optimal subse
quent biopsy strategy for, detecting concurrent cancer in patients diagnose
d with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.
Materials and Methods: Of 63 men with isolated high grade prostatic intraep
ithelial neoplasia on initial biopsy 45 underwent repeat biopsy within 1 ye
ar. Certain biopsy patterns were used for repeat biopsy, including only the
neoplasia site in 8 men, sextant in 12, sextant plus bilateral transition
zone in 13 and 11 core multisite directed (sextant, bilateral transition zo
ne, bilateral anterior horn of the peripheral zone and midline peripheral z
one) in 12. We compared the location of high grade disease on the initial b
iopsy with the cancer site on repeat biopsy.
Results: Repeat biopsy revealed cancer in 10 of the 45 men (22%), and the s
ites of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer correlate
d in 6, Cancer was detected at the sextant locations in 9 men. Of the 15 co
res positive for cancer 8 were at the original high grade neoplasia site, 6
at a random sextant biopsy site and 1 in the transition zone. High grade d
isease was discovered bilaterally in 1 man, while prostatic intraepithelial
neoplasia and cancer were detected on the same side in the remaining 9.
Conclusions: The optimal repeat biopsy strategy for patients with high grad
e prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia has not yet been determined but at a
minimum it should include targeting the area of known high grade disease an
d the ipsilateral sextants.