S. Lonial et al., High dose chemotherapy without hematopoietic cell support for the treatment of refractory lymphoma, LEUK LYMPH, 36(5-6), 2000, pp. 497-502
Conventional dose combination chemotherapy for patients with relapsed or re
fractory lymphoma is rarely curative. High dose chemotherapy followed by he
matopoietic progenitor cell transplant (HPCT) has a clearly defined role in
patients who have first relapsed after standard CHOP chemotherapy for lymp
homa. However, the role of HPCT is less well defined for patients with chem
o-resistant, or chemo-refractory disease. Sixteen patients (15 Non-Hodgkin'
s, 1 Hodgkin's Disease) were entered into a phase II study to determine if
a dose intensive induction regimen in heavily pre-treated refractory lympho
ma patients could permit further consolidation with HPCT. The primary endpo
ints were survival, response, toxicity and resource utilization. The regime
n consisted of continuous infusion etoposide 1 or 2 gm/m(2)/72 hours, idaru
bicin 12mg/m(2)/d far 3 days followed by cytarabine 2gm/m(2)/72 hours on da
ys 8,9, and 10 (VIC). Fifteen patients were evaluable for objective respons
e. The overall response rate was 53% with 7 patients achieving a partial re
sponse and 1 patient achieving a complete response. Of the 8 responders, 6
patients subsequently received high dose chemotherapy followed by HPCT (4 a
utologous, 2 allogeneic). The median survival was 176 days for the non-resp
onders contrasted with 722 days for the responders. The average duration of
hospitalization was 38 days. Toxicity was mainfest primarily as mucositis
with a median grade of 3 among the first 13 patients, and a median grade of
2 in three subsequent patients who received an etoposide dose of 1gm/m(2)/
72 hours. All patients had an episode of neutropenic fever and 5 patients d
eveloped clinically significant pneumonitis during therapy.
The VIC regimen is active in the treatment of chemo-refractory lymphoma wit
h clinically significant differences in survival for patients who respond t
o therapy. Further modifications to the regimen could include the addition
of a topoisomerase I inhibitor for synergy with etoposide, and using VIC as
part of a tandem transplant regimen where response to VIC would allow furt
her therapy with a myeloablative induction followed by HPCT.