Metabolic mass, metabolic rate, caloric restriction, and aging in male Fischer 344 rats

Citation
Ja. Greenberg et Cn. Boozer, Metabolic mass, metabolic rate, caloric restriction, and aging in male Fischer 344 rats, MECH AGE D, 113(1), 2000, pp. 37-48
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Cell & Developmental Biology
Journal title
MECHANISMS OF AGEING AND DEVELOPMENT
ISSN journal
00476374 → ACNP
Volume
113
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
37 - 48
Database
ISI
SICI code
0047-6374(20000124)113:1<37:MMMRCR>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Previous investigators have found the metabolic rate to be the same in calo rically-restricted and ad-libitum fed rodents, and hence concluded that the Rate of Living Theory does not help explain the longer lifespan of the cal orically-restricted (CR) animal. However, these previous instigators may no t have used reliable estimates of metabolic mass in their calculations of m etabolic rate. Hence the present study investigated the reliability of ten different estimates of metabolic mass (MM) in 21-month-old male Fischer 344 rats fed three different diets to yield a wide range of body compositions. Two criteria were used to rank each estimate of metabolic mass: strong cor relation with daily caloric intake (DCI); and zero Y-intercept on the regre ssion curve of DCI versus the MM. The combined weight of the heart, liver, kidneys and brain (OW) was found to be the best estimate of MM. Statistical analysis of the differences in metabolic rate in the three groups of rats showed that the significance of these differences depended on the estimate of MM used. OW yielded different results than did fat-free mass (FFM), body weight (BW), BW0.75, and BW0.67. Therefore, because previous investigators used FFM, BW, BW0.75, or BW0.67, rather than a more reliable estimate such as OW, their finding that metabolic rate was not different in the CR and a d-lib groups, and their conclusion that the Rate of Living Theory does not help explain the longer lifespan of the CR animal, are called into question . (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.