Effect of cooking and supplementation on nutritional value of Gram (Cicer arietinum)

Citation
N. Bhatty et al., Effect of cooking and supplementation on nutritional value of Gram (Cicer arietinum), NUTR RES, 20(2), 2000, pp. 297-307
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
NUTRITION RESEARCH
ISSN journal
02715317 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
297 - 307
Database
ISI
SICI code
0271-5317(200002)20:2<297:EOCASO>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
The study was conducted to determine the nutiritional value of Gram (Cicer arietinum) in raw and cooked forms. Supplement value of various types of me at i.e. poultry, mutton and beef at 10, 15, and 20 percent levels for dites containing cooked Gram was also assessed. Nutritional value of Gram was de termined by chemical analysis as well as through rat assay. Gram contained an average of 23.01 percent protein and less then two percent fibre. Minor changes were noticed in the proximate composition of Gram after cooking. Co nventional method of cooking resulted in a loss amounting to more then one percent in Gram protein. Gram had good amount of lysine (1.31 percent) but cooking destroyed 28 percent of it. Other amino acids in Gram also showed l osses on cooking. Protein efficiency ratio (PER) of diets containing raw Gr am was 1.46, which was drastically reduced to 0.79 by cooking. Cooking of G ram significantly improved true digestibility (TD) percentage from 64.57 in raw to 77.87 percent in cooked. However, net protein utilization (NPU) was improved from 36.69 in raw to 38.44 in cooked. Diets containing cooked Gra m and supplemented with different types of meat significantly improved PER (1.02 to 1.45), TD 78.13 to 86.58 percent and NPU 38.61 to 44.40 percent ov er non supplemented diets. 20 percent level of supplemented meat showed com paratively better results than other levels in case of PER, TD and NPU. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.