The purpose of this study was to compare the initial stiffness of two techn
iques for posterior interbody lumbar fusion (PLIF) by a finite element appr
oach. Thus a finite element model of a human L3/4 spinal segment was genera
ted. Stiffness of the intact model was tested under compression (600 N), to
rsion (25 Nm) and shearing forces (250 N) without preload. The results were
compared to the stiffness following simulation of PLIF with two BAK-Cages
and PLIF with two Harms-Cages and additional posterior screw-rod-osteosynth
esis. PLIF with two BAK-Cages resulted in a loss of stiffness in compressio
n, torsion and shearing. PLIF with two Harms-Cages and posterior osteosynth
esis resulted in an increase of stiffness in compression, torsion and shear
ing.