Background. The number of shots in the childhood immunization schedule has
been increasing and is likely to continue to increase in the coming years.
Consideration of the psychologic costs of multiple injections, adverse even
ts and vaccine-preventable disease is therefore growing in importance.
Methods. We assessed parent preferences, using both the time tradeoff (i.e.
amount of parent time willing to trade) and willingness-to-pay (i.e, dolla
rs willing to pay) metrics, for possible outcomes of vaccination among 206
parents of infants receiving care at Kaiser, Northern California Region, We
also explored the relationship between preferences and subject characteris
tics.
Results. In general the amount of time subjects were willing to give up and
the quantity of money they were milling to spend to avoid an outcome incre
ased with the severity of the outcome. Preferences for our six main outcome
s of interest all differed from one another (P < 0.0001, Tukey's multiple c
omparisons procedure). Rank correlation coefficients between time tradeoff
and willingness-to-pay values for the six main outcomes ranged from 0.42 to
0.52 (all P < 0.004), Subject characteristics, including education, income
, race/ethnicity and the child's birth order, did not explain the variation
in parent preferences.
Conclusions, In general subjects were willing to give up more money or time
to avoid less desired outcomes. They were willing to give up only very sma
ll amounts of their own life expectancy or money to avoid minor, temporary
outcomes (e.g. moderate fussiness, fever and pain) whereas they were willin
g to forego substantial lengths of their life or amounts of money to avoid
a major, permanent outcome (i.e. permanent disability), Nonetheless much va
riation surfaced in the amount of time (or money) subjects were willing to
trade to avoid outcomes. If this variation represents true differences in p
references, guideline developers must consider the role of individual paren
t preferences in decisions concerning vaccination.