Alberta infant motor scale: Reliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Taiwan

Citation
Sf. Jeng et al., Alberta infant motor scale: Reliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Taiwan, PHYS THER, 80(2), 2000, pp. 168-178
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
PHYSICAL THERAPY
ISSN journal
00319023 → ACNP
Volume
80
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
168 - 178
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-9023(200002)80:2<168:AIMSRA>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Background and Purpose. The goal of this study was to examine the reliabili ty and validity of measurements obtained with the Alberta Infant Motor Scal e (AIMS) for evaluation of preterm infants in Taiwan. Subjects. Two indepen dent groups of preterm infants were used to investigate the reliability (n= 45) and validity (n=41) for the AIMS. Methods. In the reliability study, th e AIMS was administered to the infants by a physical therapist, and infant performance was videotaped. The performance tvas then rescored by the same therapist and by 2 other therapists to examine the intrarater and interrate r reliability. In the validity study, the AIMS and the Bayley Motor Scale w ere administered to the infants at 6 and 12 months of age to examine criter ion-related validity. Results. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) f or intrarater and interrater reliability of measurements obtained with the AIMS were high (ICC=.97-.99). The AIMS scores correlated with the Bayley Mo tor Scale scores at 6 and 12 months (r = .78 and .90), although the AIMS sc ores at 6 months were only moderately predictive of the motor function at 1 2 months (r = .56). Conclusion and Discussion. The results suggest that mea surements obtained with the AIMS have acceptable reliability and concurrent validity but limited predictive value for evaluating preterm Taiwanese inf ants.