On-line carcass inspection of chickens in the United States is currently do
ne using visual (organoleptic) methods. Inspectors from the USDA Food Safet
y and Inspection Service (FSIS) inspect the viscera and carcass and, for ol
der birds, the heads using a sequence of observations and palpations at a p
ostmortem inspection station. The streamlined inspection system (SIS) and:t
he new line speed inspection system (NELS) are the most prevalent visual in
spection methods. The former has a line speed of 70 birds/min with two insp
ectors per line, and the latter has a line speed of 91 birds/min requiring
three inspectors per line. Both inspection methods are labor intensive and
prone to human error. In addition, the speed of the slaughter line is dicta
ted by the number of birds per minute that can be inspected by FSIS inspect
ors. Ninety-one birds/min is currently the maximum visual inspection Line s
peed allowed under current Federal regulations. This study evaluates the ec
onomic benefits of using automated inspection in place of visual inspection
from the perspective of both the slaughter plant and FSIS. The results ind
icate that FSIS and slaughter plants would gain economic benefits by using
automated inspection in place of visual inspection. The economic benefits t
o FSIS would accrue from labor savings, whereas the economic benefits to sl
aughter plants would accrue primarily from increased throughput from faster
inspection line speeds.