IN THIS essay we argue that literacy inquiry has often been less effective
than it should be. Policy makers and self-proclaimed experts with narrow po
litical agendas easily capture public attention by assaulting our inquiry w
ith arguments grounded in the rhetoric of public accountability, scientific
rigor, and the future of our children. While literacy researchers are ofte
n ignored or discredited in the broader arena of educational policy and the
popular media, we remain internally divided by arguments over paradigms, m
ethod, and instructional approaches, and distracted by our desires for acad
emic prestige. Within this embattled context, our best ethical visions and
deepest social commitments have been lost. We recommend pragmatism as a res
torative tonic for our field. Pragmatism, a practical philosophy and encomp
assing methodology motivated by the need to solve pressing problems, can de
liver us from the mire of paradigm debates and offer a hopeful vision for t
he next millennium. We offer three dimensions for researchers to use in ree
xamining with whom they do research and under what circumstances; to reflec
t on how problems for inquiry are selected; and, to reconsider how research
traditions and methodologies are defined and used in the conduct and consu
mption of research.