Accuracy of oximetry with thermistor (OxiFlow) for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea and hypopnea

Citation
Ma. Baltzan et al., Accuracy of oximetry with thermistor (OxiFlow) for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea and hypopnea, SLEEP, 23(1), 2000, pp. 61-69
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
SLEEP
ISSN journal
01618105 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
61 - 69
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-8105(20000201)23:1<61:AOOWT(>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for obstructive sleep apnea and hypopnea (OSAH) of the OxiFlow (OF) device which combines oximetry wit h recording of thermistor airflow. Design & Setting: Patients scheduled for overnight diagnostic polysomnograp hy (PSG) were studied with OF either simultaneously during laboratory PSG ( L-OF, n=86), at home on a separate night (H-OF, n=66), or both (n=55). Patients: 97 patients with suspected OSAH, of whom 40 had OSAH defined as a n apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of more than 15 events per hour of sleep on PS G. Interventions: NA Measurements & Results: The automated respiratory disturbance index (RDI) g enerated by the OF software considerably underestimated the AHI by PSG for both L-OF and H-OF. Altering the parameters for hypopnea identification by the software did not improve this. Visual inspection of the computerized OF tracings added considerable diagnostic information, but a manual count of RDI during visual review overestimated AHI. For the identification of cases vs. non-cases of OSAH, receiver operating characteristic area-under-the-cu rve statistics ranged from 0.77 - 0.90 for L-OF and from 0.71 - 0.77 for H- OF. Combining automated analysis with subsequent visual inspection of OF tr acings yielded an overall sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 74% for the diagnosis of OSAH during H-OF recordings. Analysis of potential technician time saved indicated a benefit from the use of OF. Conclusions: OF has diagnostic utility for the identification of OSAH. Howe ver, because of hardware and software limitations, it is unclear whether th is device is superior to oximetry alone.