Rj. Stratta et al., A prospective comparison of systemic-bladder versus portal-enteric drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation, SURGERY, 127(2), 2000, pp. 217-226
Background. Most pancreas transplants are performed with systemic venous de
livery of insulin and bladder drainage of the exocrine secretions (systemic
-bladder [S-B]). To develop a more physiologic procedure, we performed panc
reas transplantations with portal venous delivery of insulin and enteric dr
ainage of the exocrine secretions (portal-enteric [P-E]).
Methods, During an Ii-month period we prospectively alternated 32 consecuti
ve pancreas transplant recipients to either S-B (n = 16) or P-E (n = 16) dr
ainage with standardized immunosuppression.
Results. Patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates after simultane
ous kidney, and pancreas transplantation were 91 % S-B versus 32 % P-E, 91
% S-B versus 92 % P-E, and 82 % S-B versus 92 % P-E, respectively. Pancreas
graft survival rates after solitary pancreas transplantation were 80% S-B
versus 75% PIE. There were no graft losses either to immunologic or infecti
ons complications in either group, but the incidence of acute rejection was
slightly higher in the S-B group (44 % S-B vs 31 % P-E, P = NS). The cost
and length of the initial hospital stay were similar between groups. The in
cidence of operative complications, major infections, and cytomegalovirus i
nfections were likewise comparable. However; the S-B group was characterize
d by a slight increase in the number of readmissions, urinary tract infecti
ons, and urologic complications. Furthermore, metabolic acidosis and dehydr
ation were more common in the S-B group.
Conclusions. Pancreas transplantation with P-E drainage can be performed wi
th short-term results comparable to those of transplantation with S-B drain
age.