Jd. Spitz et Me. Arregui, Sutureless laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy using reusable instruments; Two hundred three repairs without recurrence, SURG LA E P, 10(1), 2000, pp. 24-29
Laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair has several distinct advantages
over the anterior repair and the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal
method. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair allows detection and rep
air of occult contralateral defects with minimal risk of intraabdominal inj
ury or adhesion formation and is associated with less pain and a quicker re
covery. However, there are disadvantages. Circumferential mobilization of t
he spermatic cord and the use of staples to secure the mesh have been assoc
iated with injury to the spermatic cord and nerves. The cost of the laparos
copic approach is higher than that of open hemiorrhaphy. Additionally, it i
s more difficult to do because there is a poor understanding of the preperi
toneal fascial anatomy. A method of totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernio
rrhaphy emphasizing anatomic dissection and landmarks is described. The aut
hors use only reusable instruments, no balloon dissector, and no fixation o
f the mesh. The wide dissection of the myopectineal orifice allows placemen
t of a large mesh and utilizes intraabdominal pressure alone to secure the
mesh on the posterior aspect of the abdominal wall, as described by Stoppa
et al. (I). Operative costs are minimized. From experience with 203 suturel
ess extraperitoneal repairs, a low incidence of complications and no recurr
ences are demonstrated. It is extrapolated that the cost of this laparoscop
ic repair will approximate more closely that of open anterior herniorrhaphy
.