PARTHENOGENETIC CNEMIDOPHORUS-TESSELATUS COMPLEX (SAURIA, TEIIDAE) - A NEOTYPE FOR DIPLOID C-TESSELATUS (SAY, 1823), REDESCRIPTION OF THE TAXON, AND DESCRIPTION OF A NEW TRIPLOID SPECIES
Jm. Walker et al., PARTHENOGENETIC CNEMIDOPHORUS-TESSELATUS COMPLEX (SAURIA, TEIIDAE) - A NEOTYPE FOR DIPLOID C-TESSELATUS (SAY, 1823), REDESCRIPTION OF THE TAXON, AND DESCRIPTION OF A NEW TRIPLOID SPECIES, Herpetologica, 53(2), 1997, pp. 233-259
Since 1967, the name Cnemidophorus tesselatus (Say, 1823) has been in
use for a hybrid-derived complex of whiptail lizards known to include
both diploid and triploid parthenogenetic populations distributed in p
arts of Colorado, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Arizona, Texas, and Chihuahua
(Mexico). Application of new binomial nomenclature to additional popul
ations in the complex has long been delayed by philosophical disagreem
ent among workers as to what constitutes a parthenogenetic species of
Cnemidophorus in addition to the daunting operational challenge of con
structing workable diagnoses for arguably different populations. We co
ncur with a body of opinion that, presently, C. dixoni Scudday, 1973 i
s the appropriate name for certain disjunct diploid populations of liz
ards in Hidalgo County, New Mexico, and Presidio County, Texas, despit
e the fact that some workers continue to allocate these populations to
C. tesselatus. We have redefined the remaining diploid populations de
rived from hybridization between C. marmoratus marmoratus (=C. tigris)
and C. gularis septemvittatus (=C. septemvittatus) as an evolutionary
species for which the name C. tesselatus was available. To affect sta
bility in the assignment of this name, we designate a neotype and redi
agnose the taxon which is geographically distributed in the states pre
viously noted for the complex. We allocate triploid populations derive
d from hybridization between normally parthenogenetic C. tesselatus an
d gonochoristic C. sexlineatus to a cytogenetically and morphologicall
y distinct new species restricted to parts of four counties in southea
stern Colorado. We found no evidence that the triploid population of l
izards in and near Ninemile Valley of the Purgatoire River, Otero Coun
ty, Colorado should be assigned to a second triploid species as was re
commended by some previous authors. All specimens of C. dixoni, C. tes
selatus, and the new triploid species were identifiable by highly diag
nostic features of dorsal color and/or pattern (i.e., configuration of
the stripes on the body and pattern of spots and/or bars on the body,
posterior surfaces of the thighs, and base of the tail) evident under
both field and laboratory conditions. Each of these species includes
either distinctive classes of color pattern or morphological variants
subject to further evaluation for taxonomic recognition. Sympatry betw
een C, tesselatus and the triploid species was noted only in and near
Ninemile Valley, Colorado; sympatry between C. tesselatus and C. dixon
i has been reported only in Pinto Canyon, Presidio County, Texas.