OBJECTIVE. Dynamic MR imaging may be used as an alternative to dynamic cyst
oproctography for the evaluation of pelvic floor prolapse and configuration
. MR criteria for normality are derived from proctographic studies because
no large MR study of asymptomatic individuals has been performed. Our study
aimed to define the normal range of dynamic pelvic MR appearances in a lar
ge group of asymptomatic individuals.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Fifty healthy adult volunteers (25 men and 25 women;
age range, 20-66 years; mean age, 34 years) were prospectively recruited an
d examined using dynamic MR imaging. All subjects were interviewed and esta
blished as healthy using a validated questionnaire. Axial, coronal, and sag
ittal MR imaging was performed at rest and during maximum pelvic strain usi
ng a static 1.0-T unit and a fast-field-echo sequence, providing 10 slices
in 31 sec. Standardized measurements of pelvic configuration were taken, an
d rest and strain imaging were compared to determine the range of normal ap
pearances.
RESULTS. Three women developed a cystocele during maximum pelvic strain, tw
o of whom also showed grade 1 uterocervical prolapse, which was also seen i
n another woman. Three men showed posterior pelvic floor descent in excess
of 3 cm during straining. No rectocele, enterocele, rectal prolapse, or per
ineal hernia was seen in any subject.
CONCLUSION. The normal range of pelvic organ descent in asymptomatic subjec
ts seen on dynamic MR imaging included cystocele, uterocervical prolapse, a
nd excessive anorectal junction descent. Although we encountered pelvic pro
lapse in seven volunteers, it was infrequent and low grade, suggesting that
criteria for abnormality derived from proctography art generally applicabl
e to MR imaging.