Manual versus image analysis estimation of PCNA in breast carcinoma

Citation
Im. Francis et al., Manual versus image analysis estimation of PCNA in breast carcinoma, ANAL QUAN C, 22(1), 2000, pp. 11-16
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY
ISSN journal
08846812 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
11 - 16
Database
ISI
SICI code
0884-6812(200002)22:1<11:MVIAEO>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare manual to image analysis estimation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression in paraffin sections of breast carci nomas. STUDY DESIGN: Paraffin sections of 51 breast carcinomas were stained with p rimary antibody to PCNA. Nuclear PCNA expression in 100 randomly Selected t umor cells from marked areas was manually graded from 0 to 3. Antigen expre ssion was also calculated by a cell analysis system (CAS-200, Becton Dickin son, Elmhurst, Illinois, U.S.A.)from marked and random microscopic fields. Obtained proliferative inner (PI) from both methods was compared. RESULTS: Manually calculated PI correlated strongly with the CAS-200-calcul ated PI (P <.01). The highest correlation was seen between the CAS-200 PI v alue and manually calculated PI value using grade 2 and 3 nuclei. A particu larly high correlation was noted between the number of positive nuclei and antigen staining area (P <.01) as estimated by the CAS-200. CONCLUSION: Nuclear expression of PCNA and other nuclear antigens can be ac curately evaluated by an image analysis system. The speed and objectivity o f such machines allow the evaluation of larger parts of tissues and provide more-representative antigen expression profiles.