Measuring physical activity in peripheral arterial disease: A comparison of two physical activity questionnaires with an accelerometer

Citation
Mm. Mcdermott et al., Measuring physical activity in peripheral arterial disease: A comparison of two physical activity questionnaires with an accelerometer, ANGIOLOGY, 51(2), 2000, pp. 91-100
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
ANGIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00033197 → ACNP
Volume
51
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
91 - 100
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3197(200002)51:2<91:MPAIPA>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD)-related exertional leg pain may limit phy sical activity, thereby contributing to mobility loss and increasing cardio vascular morbidity and mortality in men and women with PAD. The objectives of this study were: (1) to compare objectively measured physical activity l evels between patients with and without PAD, (2) to assess the validity of two physical activity questionnaires in patients with PAD. Twenty PAD patie nts from a noninvasive vascular laboratory and 21 patients without PAD from a general medicine practice wore an accelerometer continuously for 7 days to measure physical activity objectively. After 7 days, participants comple ted the leisure time physical activity questionnaire (LTPAQ), derived from the Health Interview Survey, and the Stanford 7-day physical activity recal l questionnaire (PARQ). PAD participants had markedly lower physical activi ty levels than non-PAD participants as measured by accelerometer (803 kcal/ week +/-364 (range=284-2,000, median=708) vs 1,750 kcal/week +1,296 (range= 882-6,586, median=1,278), p<0.001). For the LTPAQ, physical activity levels in PAD and non-PAD participants were 609 kcal/week +/-576 (range=0-2,085, median=529) vs 832 kcal/week +/-784 (range-53-2,820, median= 623), p=0.128. For the PARQ, physical activity levels in PAD and non-PAD participants wer e 234 METS/week +/-21 (range=214-301, median=229) vs 238 METS/week +/-11 (r ange=225-268, median=234), p=0.454, respectively. Pearson's correlation coe fficient for the association between the accelerometer and the log-transfor med LTPAQ measure was 0.419 (p=0.006). Pearson's correlation coefficient wa s 0.348 for the association between the accelerometer and the log-transform ed PARQ measure of physical activity (p=0.026). In conclusion, PAD patients have significantly lower physical activity levels than non-PAD patients. T wo commonly used physical activity questionnaires were less sensitive than objective measurement to the association between PAD and inactivity.