Upper gastrointestinal tract safety profile of alendronate - The Fracture Intervention Trial

Citation
Dc. Bauer et al., Upper gastrointestinal tract safety profile of alendronate - The Fracture Intervention Trial, ARCH IN MED, 160(4), 2000, pp. 517-525
Citations number
56
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00039926 → ACNP
Volume
160
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
517 - 525
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9926(20000228)160:4<517:UGTSPO>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether alendronate sodium treatment is associated with upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract adverse experiences (AEs)-particula rly those of the stomach, duodenum, or esophagus-in the Fracture interventi on Trial, and to assess the relationship between alendronate use and upper GI tract events among women at increased risk for these outcomes. Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a mean foll ow-up of 3.8 years. Women were initially randomized to receive alendronate sodium, 5 mg/d, or placebo. After 2 years, the alendronate sodium dose was increased to 10 mg/d. Participants: A total of 6459 women aged 54 to 81 years recruited from 11 U S clinical centers. All participants had low hip bone mineral density. Wome n with major upper GI tract disease (recent ulcers, upper GI tract bleeding , or use of daily medication for dyspepsia) were excluded. Regular nonstero idal anti-inflammatory drug users were not excluded. Measurements: Self-reported upper GI tract AEs were ascertained by intervie w every 3 months. Serious upper GI tract AEs were confirmed and classified by review of hospital records and endoscopy reports, if available. Upper GI tract AEs were further analyzed in 2 specified groups-gastroduodenal and e sophageal-to examine events that might be related to upper GI tract mucosal irritation. Gastric and duodenal perforations, ulcers, and bleeding events were combined for analysis of these clinically important outcomes. Results: The overall incidence of upper GI tract events was similar in the alendronate and placebo groups (47.5% vs 46.2%; relative risk [RR], 1.02; 9 5% confidence interval [Cl], 0.95-1.10), The incidence of gastroduodenal pe rforations, ulcers, and bleeding events was 1.6% in the alendronate group a nd 1.9% in the placebo group (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.59-1.24). The incidence o f nonspecific upper GI tract conditions, such as abdominal pain, dyspepsia, nausea, and vomiting, nas also similar in the 2 groups. Esophageal events occurred in 10.0% and 9.4% of patients in the alendronate and placebo group s, respectively (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91-1.24). Esophagitis not reported as reflux was more common in the alendronate group (0.7%) than in the placebo group (0.4%), but not significantly so (RR, 1.72; 95% CI, 0.90-3.39). Alend ronate use was not associated with a significant increase in upper GI tract events among women at increased risk for these events (those aged greater than or equal to 75 years with previous upper GI tract disease or using non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Conclusion: In these older women, upper GI tract complaints, particularly d yspepsia and abdominal pain, were common, but alendronate treatment was not associated with an increased incidence of upper GI tract events, even in h igh-risk subgroups.