This retrospective study compared the outcome of two consecutive groups of
patients having primary total knee arthroplasty, The arthroplasties were pe
rformed in the first group (169 arthroplasties in 143 patients) from 1988 t
o 1992 using a medial parapatellar approach, and in the second group (167 a
rthroplasties in 148 patients) from 1992 to 1996 using a subvastus approach
. The patient outcomes were evaluated at 6 months, and were based on clinic
al and radiographic measures, occurrence of intraoperative lateral retinacu
lar release, and incidence of postoperative patellar subluxation. There wer
e no significant differences between the two groups for range of motion, Kn
ee Society knee and function scores, and stair climbing ability. The patell
a tracked centrally in significantly more knees with the subvastus approach
(139 of 167 knees, 83%) than with the parapatellar approach (107 of 169 kn
ees, 63%). There were significantly fewer knees in the subvastus group requ
iring a lateral retinacular release (62 of 167 knees, 37%), compared with t
he parapatellar group (113 of 169 knees, 67%). The authors concluded that t
he subvastus approach led to improved patellar tracking and stability. Alth
ough the surgical and rehabilitative protocols were identical for both grou
ps, the results may have been affected by changing circumstances during the
9-year period of the study.