Once again the staggering variation in IV sedation practice between differe
nt countries is highlighted. This year the "to sedate or not sedate" debate
focuses on colonoscopy Several papers on the use of Propofol are reviewed,
It remains this authors' opinion that propofol is an anaesthetic agent to
be used by (or at least in the presence of an anaesthetist. Informed consen
t and the question of what to do if a patient withdraws consent halfway thr
ough the procedure are discussed. Predictably further recent papers on the
relative merits of midazolam and diazepam ale presented plus another report
on the use of flumazenil in the recovery period. The use of 3% hydrogen pe
roxide solution to aid the visualization of acutely bleeding gastro-duodena
l lesions is presented in two papers along with a discussion of its possibl
e mode of action. The use of antispasmodics to aid colonoscopy is further d
iscussed: this year concentrating on the use of hyoscyamine sulphate las op
posed to hyoscine butylbromide, the preferred agent in the UK). The patient
s receiving hyoscyamine sulphate had significantly shorter caecal intubatio
n times, better sedation and easier colonic insertion. The "downside" was d
rug-induced tachycardia and the authors caution against the widespread use
of this drug until this situation is further clarified. The subject of hypo
xaemia at the time of gastroscopy; colonoscopy and ERCP was reviewed last y
ear and further papers are presented in which the incidence of various leve
ls of hypoxia are given, In anaesthetic circles it would be considered tota
lly unacceptable to allow a patient's oxygen saturation to fall below 85%,
and Set we continue to have papers reporting its incidence. This level of d
esaturation is potential dangerous and the routine use of supplemental oxyg
en would greatly reduce this unneccessary risk to patients.