A solid-state fluorine-NMR study on hexafluorobenzene sorbed by sediments,polymers, and active carbon

Citation
G. Cornelissen et al., A solid-state fluorine-NMR study on hexafluorobenzene sorbed by sediments,polymers, and active carbon, ENV SCI TEC, 34(4), 2000, pp. 645-649
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology,"Environmental Engineering & Energy
Journal title
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
0013936X → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
645 - 649
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-936X(20000215)34:4<645:ASFSOH>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
In sediments, distinct fractions of compound desorbing at different rates a re encountered. These fractions desorb rapidly (desorption rate constants s imilar to 10(-1) h(-1)), slowly (similar to 10(-3) h(-1)), or very slowly ( 10(-5)-10(-4) h(-1)). The source of dissimilarity between kinetically diffe rent sorbate fractions in sediment has been investigated. Sediments with he xafluorobenzene (HFB) at either rapidly or (slowly + very slowly) desorbing sites were subjected to solid-state MAS F-19 NMR measurements. Active carb on, glassy polystyrene, and rubbery polyacetal with sorbed HFB were also te sted, to establish possible similarities between sediments and model sorben ts. HFB in sediment at rapidly desorbing sites showed a resonance at -125.5 ppm relative to CFCl3, whereas HFB at slowly desorbing sites showed a reso nance at -165.6 ppm. We did not observe an NMR signal for the HFB fraction at very slowly desorbing sites, probably because the amounts of this fracti on were too small. The observations indicate that the kinetically different fractions are probably present in different (physicochemical) environments in the sediment. The lines observed for both rapidly and slowly desorbing HFB were relatively narrow (similar to 1.5 and similar to 3 ppm, respective ly), indicating that the molecules in both fractions are sorbed in a fairly homogeneous way. However, the exact explanation of the chemical shifts and line widths in terms of sorption mechanisms remains unclear. Similar to th e sediment samples, polystyrene and active carbon also show two populations of sorbed HFB, whereas we observe only one population in polyacetal. In th e active carbon sample one F-19 chemical shift clearly deviates from the on es in sediment (-176.6 ppm), whereas the other active carbon signal is simi lar to sediment (-125.5 ppm). The chemical shift of HFB in polyacetal is -1 67.2 ppm. The chemical shifts of the two fluorine signals of HFB in polysty rene are comparable to the ones for sediment(-163.9 and -125.5 ppm, respect ively), supporting the hypothesis that sediment organic matter is a nanopor ous material similar to a glassy polymer.