Scientific and expert advisory committees responsible for food products oft
en have the advantage of being relatively unhindered by rigid regulations a
nd the simultaneous disadvantage of having few guidelines to clarify their
role in directing the research and approval process. Committees can thus mi
ss opportunities to function in a proactive advisory capacity, and to assis
t in predetermining what research and documentation are necessary for regul
atory approval of ii particular food product. This paper examines the ways
scientific and expert committees for nutritional products can contribute to
formulation of procedures for effective hypothesis and study design develo
pment, preparation of well-structured, complete dossiers for product approv
al, and transparent interactions with petitioners.