A. Ekborn et al., Cisplatin-induced hearing loss: influence of the mode of drug administration in the guinea pig, HEARING RES, 140(1-2), 2000, pp. 38-44
Cisplatin (8 mg/kg) was given intravenously to guinea pigs either as a 15 s
bolus injection (25 animals) or as a 1 h infusion (28 animals). To determi
ne the influence of the mode of cisplatin administration and pharmacokineti
cs on the ototoxic side-effect, the concentrations of cisplatin and the bio
transformation product monoaquated cisplatin were determined in blood ultra
filtrate using liquid chromatography with post-column derivatization. Ototo
xic effect was evaluated as difference in pre- and 96 h post-exposure audit
ory brainstem response (ABR) threshold. The cisplatin peak concentration wa
s considerably higher, 19.2 +/- 2.4 mu g/ml, in the bolus injection group t
han in the infusion group, 6.7+/-0.5 mu g/ml (mean+/-S.E.M.). The area unde
r the blood ultrafiltrate concentration time curve (AUC) for cisplatin was
slightly greater in the infusion group, 442+/-26 mu g/ml/min, than in the b
olus injection group, 340 +/- 5 mu g/ml/min. For monoaqua cisplatin, the AU
C was not different between the groups (bolus injection: 30.8 +/- 1.5 mu g/
ml/min, infusion: 34.1 +/- 3.3 mu g/ml/min). A significant ototoxic effect
was observed in both groups at 20 and 12.5 kHz, but there was no difference
between the groups in the extent of threshold shift. The interindividual v
ariability in susceptibility to ABR threshold shift was far greater than th
e variability in pharmacokinetics, suggesting that other factors are more i
mportant in determining the degree of hearing loss. (C) 2000 Elsevier Scien
ce B.V. All rights reserved.