The received understanding of Winch's critique of social science is that he
propounded a radically relativist, anti-explanatory and a-critical concept
ion of the legitimate task of 'social studies'. This conception is presumed
to be predicated upon an extension of Wittgenstein in's critique of philos
ophy. I argue, against this view, that Winch reads Wittgenstein through a K
antian framework, and that in fact he advanced a rigorously essentialist an
d universalist picture of 'social phenomena'. It is Winch's underlying Kant
ian metaphysics that has made his ideas attractive to contemporary architec
ts of critical social theory such as Giddens and Habermas. However, in oppo
sition to the latter, and in spite of his Kantianism, I discern in Winch a
genuinely critical attitude towards social understanding.