This article offers a detailed comparison of the transition elements descri
bed by P.P. Lynn and A.R. Ingraffea [International Journal for Numerical Me
thods in Engineering 12, 1031-1036] and C. Manu [Engineering Fracture Mecha
nics 24, 509-512]. The source of a numerical phenomenon in using Manu's tra
nsition element (TE) is explained. The effect of eight-noded TEs with diffe
rent quarter-point elements (QPE) on the calculated stress intensity factor
s (SIFs) is investigated. Strain at the crack tip is shown to be singular f
or any ray emanating from the crack tip within an eight-noded TE, but strai
n has both r(-1/2) and r(-1) singularities, with r(-1/2) dominating for lar
ge TEs. Semi-transition elements (STEs) are defined and shown to have a mar
ginal effect on the calculated SIFs. Nine-noded transition elements are for
mulated whose strain singularity is shown to be the same as that of eight-n
oded TEs. Then the effect of eight-noded and nine-noded TEs with collapsed
triangular QPEs, and rectangular and nonrectangular quadrilateral eight-nod
ed and nine-noded QPEs, is studied, and nine-noded TEs are shown to behave
exactly like eight-noded TEs with rectangular eight-noded and nine-noded QP
Es and to behave almost the same with other QPEs. The layered transition el
ements proposed by V. Murti and S.Valliapan [Engineering Fracture Mechanics
25, 237-258] are formulated correctly. The effect of layered transition el
ements is shown by two numerical examples.