No beneficial effect from addition of etoposide to daunorubicin, cytarabine, and 6-mercaptopurine in individualized induction therapy of adult acute myeloid leukemia: the JALSG-AML92 study
S. Miyawaki et al., No beneficial effect from addition of etoposide to daunorubicin, cytarabine, and 6-mercaptopurine in individualized induction therapy of adult acute myeloid leukemia: the JALSG-AML92 study, INT J HEMAT, 70(2), 1999, pp. 97-104
To assess the efficacy of etoposide added to the standard remission inducti
on therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). newly diagnosed adult AML pati
ents were randomized to receive either daunorubicin (40 mg/m(2)/day x 4 or
more), behenoyl cytarabine (200 mg/m(2)/day x 10 or more), and 6-mercaptopu
rine (70 mg/m(2)/day x 10 or more) (BHAC-DM), or the same three drugs plus
etoposide (100 mg/m(2)/day x 5) (BHAC-EDM) for response-oriented individual
ized induction therapy. The patients achieving complete remission (CR) rece
ived the same 3 courses of consolidation therapy followed by 6 courses of m
aintenance/intensification therapy. M3 patients were excluded because all-t
rans retinoic acid was used.
Of 667 patients registered, 655 were evaluable. The median age was 49 (rang
e 15 to 85). CR rates were 77% in the BHAC-DM group and 75% in the BHAC-EDM
group. In 173 M4 patients, CR rates were 86% and 69% (P = 1.009), and in 3
2 M5 patients, 80% and 77% (P = 0.810) in the BHAC-DM and the BHAC-EDM grou
ps, respectively. The: predicted 6-year overall survival rates were 30% and
38% (P = 0.925) for the BHAC-DM and BHAC-EDM groups. and the disease-free
survival rates of CR patients were 25% and 35% (P = 0.352), respectively No
nhematological toxicities after the fil st course of induction therapy were
almost equal among the two groups. with the exception of a greater loss of
hair (P = 0.024) and more frequent diarrhea (P = 0.013) in the BHAC-EDM gr
oup. We concluded that in the present study, the addition of etoposide to t
he standard individualized induction therapy showed no advantage in adult A
ML, even among M4 and M5 patients. (C) 1999 The Japanese Society of Hematol
ogy.