K. Kannan et al., The p16(INK4 alpha)/p19(ARF) gene mutations are infrequent and are mutually exclusive to p53 mutations in Indian oral squamous cell carcinomas, INT J ONCOL, 16(3), 2000, pp. 585-590
Eighty-seven untreated primary oral squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) associa
ted with betel quid and tobacco chewing from Indian patients were analysed
for the presence of mutations in the commonly shared exon 2 of p16(INK4 alp
ha)/p19(ARF) genes. Polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformation po
lymorphism (PCR-SSCP) and sequencing analysis were used to detect mutations
. SSCP analysis indicated that only 9% (8/87) of the rumours had mutation i
n p16(INK4 alpha)/p19(ARF) genes. Seventy-two rumours studied here were pre
viously analysed for p53 mutations and 21% (15/72) of them were found to ha
ve mutations in p53 gene. Only one tumour was found to have mutation at bot
h p53 and p16(INK4 alpha)/p19(ARF) genes. Thus, the mutation rates observed
were 21% for p53, 9% for p16(INK4 alpha)/p19(ARF), and 1% for both. Sequen
cing analysis revealed two types of mutations; i) G to C (GCAG to CCAG) tra
nsversion type mutation at intron 1-exon 2 splice junction and ii) another
C to T transition type mutation resulting in CGA to TGA changing arginine t
o a termination codon at p16(INK4 alpha) gene codon 80 and the same mutatio
n will alter codon 94 of p10(ARF) gene from CCG to CTG (proline to leucine)
. These results suggest that p16(INK4 alpha)/p19(ARF) mutations are less fr
equent than p53 mutations in Indian oral SCCs. The p53 and p16(INK4 alpha)/
p19(ARF) mutational events are independent and are mutually exclusive sugge
sting that mutational inactivation of either p53 or p16(INK4 alpha)/p19(ARF
) may alleviate the need for the inactivation of the ether gene.