Direct drug susceptibility test for tubercle bacilli by the sputum swab culture method

Citation
S. Mathew et al., Direct drug susceptibility test for tubercle bacilli by the sputum swab culture method, INT J TUBE, 4(2), 2000, pp. 168-173
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE
ISSN journal
10273719 → ACNP
Volume
4
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
168 - 173
Database
ISI
SICI code
1027-3719(200002)4:2<168:DDSTFT>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple, inexpensive method for testing direct drug susceptibility of tubercle bacilli to isoniazid (INH) and streptomycin (SM) which can be adopted for use even in remote parts of the world. DESIGN: Using 239 smear-positive sputum specimens obtained from an equal nu mber of patients, a comparison was made between the direct swab susceptibil ity test and the standard indirect method for INH and SM using Lowenstein-J ensen (L-J) medium. RESULTS: There was 95% agreement of results for INH by 6 weeks and 90% for SM by 8 weeks; 96% of INH-resistant cultures could be detected in 5 weeks a nd 91% of SM-resistant cultures by 8 weeks. The discrepancies in the two te sts were virtually symmetrically distributed at 6 and 8 weeks. The speed an d efficiency of detection of resistance by the swab method was also assesse d in relation to the standard indirect method. For INH, 96% of the cultures were detected by the fifth week, while 66% were detected as early as 2 wee ks and 93% by 4 weeks. With SM, 84% were detected by 4 weeks, 89% by 5 week s and 91% by 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: This study has indicated the usefulness of the swab method for testing the drug susceptibility of tubercle bacilli. As this method is simp le and easy, and does not even require a centrifuge, it has the potential o f application even in the remote parts of the world. The material used, Cet avlon (Cetrimide), is inexpensive and easily water soluble, and more import antly, aqueous solutions are self-sterilizing. It should be stressed, howev er, that the results obtained with this test take the same time as conventi onal methods, and it can therefore not be considered as a rapid test.