Q. Yue et al., Alkaloid production and chinch bug resistance in endophyte-inoculated chewings and strong creeping red fescues, J CHEM ECOL, 26(1), 2000, pp. 279-292
Four Chewings fescue and two strong creeping red fescue selections that had
been artificially inoculated and stably maintained with four different end
ophytes were evaluated in feeding trials with chinch bugs (Blissus leucopte
rus hirtus). Significant differences in survival were found between the end
ophyte-inoculated plants and their endophyte-free counterparts. After seven
days, 54.2% of chinch bugs were alive on endophyte-free tillers versus onl
y 7.4% of chinch bugs fed tillers from endophyte-inoculated plants. Some di
fferences were also found among the various plant-endophyte combinations. I
n Petri dish preference trials, chinch bugs showed a preference for the CA
endophyte (obtained from a Chewings fescue) over the RC endophyte (obtained
from a strong creeping red fescue) in Chewings fescue selection C1117. Onl
y the inoculated plants produced erogvaline, peramine, and lolitrem B; more
over, significant differences were found among the plant-endophyte combinat
ions in the levels of these alkaloids. The Chewings selections C1117 and C1
090 produced more ergovaline, and C1090 more lolitrem B, than other plants,
regardless of endophyte source. In the presence of the RC endophyte, more
ergovaline and lolitrem B was produced than in the presence of the CA endop
hyte regardless of plant genotype. Both host plant and endophyte, therefore
, contributed factors that determined alkaloid production. No significant c
orrelations between chinch bug survival and alkaloid levels were found, how
ever, and overall, no one plant genotype or endophyte source proved to be s
ignificantly more toxic than another to chinch bugs. Nevertheless, the resu
lts clearly demonstrated that artificial inoculations of endophyte-free fes
cue genotypes can produce plants with increased toxicity to chinch bugs.